Tuesday, July 19, 2011
DESMOND CYRIL
(Well it wasn’t my intention to make this article a “Kyeiwaa Part 1-13” or an “Agyakoo 1,2,3 and 4” kind of thing but the issue of Homosexuality is quite lengthy and needs to be comprehensively tackled. Here is the concluding part….)
........Neither does the Qur’an support homosexuality. “The Holy book of the Moslems” makes it clearer.
In Yusufali 26:16, it reads “And leave those whom Allah has created for you to be your mates? Nay ye are people of transgression.
Koran 4:16 states, “If 2 men among you are guilty of lewdness, punish them both. If they repent and amend, leave them alone”.
Also, the Qur’an states in Qur’an 7:80-81 that “for ye practice your lusts on men in preference to women. Ye are indeed a people transgressing beyond bounds”.
It also states in Qur’an 27:55 that “would ye really approach men in your lusts, rather or in a man? Nay ye are a people ignorant”.
Additionally, the Qur’an states in 26:165-166 of its books that “of all the creatures in the world, will ye approach males and leave those whom Allah created for you to be your mates? Nay ye are a people of transgressing”.
From all indications, it’s obvious that even the Qur’an doesn’t in anyway support homosexuality. It evidently makes it more apparent how lecherous and perverse this act is.
Our traditional values, norms and beliefs don’t by any sphere of standards support this single “unnatural act”. Not even do the worst of cultures “elatedly” accept the proliferation of homosexuality. The fact is that it’s just not right, it’s wrong.
It’s an obvious slur on humanity. Animals do not even engage in this libidinous obsession. And quite stunningly, humans engage in this act with impunity. “Penetrating where you’re supposed to free your bowels is nasty and extremely iniquitous”.
Apart from its apparently detestable nature religion wise, it has extreme health implications. For the men, I heard some had to wear “pampers” to prevent messing on themselves like babies, since the passage has been “comprehensively drilled” by “the rod”.
This is what happens if we decide to manipulate the socially and religiously upright standards and do whatever we want to do, without any recourse to what is morally acceptable. If the “Anus” was the right “apparatus” for “sexual intercourse”, why would they have to wear pampers after “the act”? Why should they suffer “down there” from what is supposed to be enjoyable?
The complexity of Homosexuality evinces its elusiveness. It’s a difficult reality that evades the thought of man. It is almost practically inexplicable. What makes this worse is the fact that no one has the moral right to judge any human being. Talking about this issue without being tempted to clearly stipulate your position about it is as well hypocritical.
To be fair to the "ass drillers"(homosexuals), because of explicit human prejudice against them, I’ve concluded, highlighting a theme from John 17:12, that they have not yet been lost. In any case, their sin is not any different from adulterous, illicit and unrepentant fornicators.
They should be treated as human beings and tolerated as such. They should not be made to feel as though they are unwanted and maliciously prejudiced, sidelined and stigmatized. It doesn’t also mean that a platform should be created for them to perpetuate their illicit affairs.
Additionally, mischievous criticisms and undue suppression of the rights(where right doesn't imply that they should be allowed to practice their devilish desires but right as in right to life) of homosexuals should be stopped in compliance with the words of Jesus that “one should remove the log in his own eyes before removing the spec in another person’s eye”. Charting the course of undue subversion is quite hypocritical and is not what we need to curb this unruly behavior.
It’s most unfair to institute ferocious judgment on homosexual because those who do that might not necessarily be innocent of other pervasive and immoral practices.
This is not to say that homosexuals are right, the implications of my initial comments are that, sin is a terrible thing, and particularly for homosexuality, it can be unanimously affirmed as an impediment. In essence, it is the sin which is uncalled for and not the sinner.
My relentless problem with this people is their blatant refusal to eschew this unnatural libidinous desire and accept that they have a problem which needs to be solved. It’s really baffling that a virile man would want to have carnal knowledge of his fellow man. This is a repugnant deviation!!!!!!!!!
For me, I have no doubt in my mind whatsoever that this “atrocious and preposterous precedence” (homosexuality) is by all standards a perilous phenomenon and needs not be accepted in our society. This is not to suggest however that they should be taunted, subjected to streams of invectives or totally sidelined. Indeed homosexuals are human beings who are equally loved by God and whom Jesus died for as well. It is for such that he came to the world. Morality is essential but shouldn’t be unnecessarily applied to propel people into the peril of suicide. What they need is counsel and support, to desist from their detestable and socially unacceptable act but not a platform for them to continue the perpetration of this "Homosenselessness".
Anyone who reads this should have the enlightenment to discern the issues with an open mind and utmost candidness. It is only by these virtues that we would learn to appreciate the intricacies of this “unnatural act” and not treat it as just a libidinous desire of a pervert but that they suffer from an unconventional sexual paralysis, that needs be corrected with a human phase to ensure a harmonious society……………...........
